Unveiling Agenda 21: Globalism, Government Overreach, and Private Property

In a heated discussion hosted by Brannon Howse, guests Leo Hohmann and Tom DeWeese delved into the dangers of government overreach, corporate influence, and globalist agendas that threaten individual freedoms and self-reliance. Central to the conversation was the growing impact of the United Nations' Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030, which aim to reshape land use, economic systems, and governance under the guise of environmental sustainability.

FEMA and Disaster Relief: A Battle for Control?

One major issue discussed was the alleged obstruction by FEMA during disaster relief efforts, particularly in areas impacted by Hurricane Helene. According to accounts shared during the broadcast, FEMA is accused of preventing private citizens and organizations from delivering aid, raising concerns that federal agencies are prioritizing bureaucratic control over helping those in need. The conversation highlighted that, in several past disasters, relief from private sources was stifled or redirected because it came from "non-preferred" vendors—suggesting a focus on profit and control rather than immediate aid.

The conversation also included the personal account of private pilots trying to provide rescue assistance after a hurricane. These individuals, who had the necessary skills and resources to help, were reportedly threatened with arrest by local authorities if they continued their operations without approval from federal agencies. This incident, as discussed by Howse and his guests, exemplifies how bureaucratic procedures can sometimes take precedence over the well-being of citizens.

Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030: Moving People Off the Land

Agenda 21 and its successor, Agenda 2030, are U.N.-led initiatives that Hohmann and DeWeese believe seek to centralize control and move populations into urban areas, leaving rural lands under corporate or governmental control. These agendas are ostensibly based on environmental sustainability and reducing humanity's carbon footprint. However, critics argue that they are primarily about stripping individuals of property rights, especially those who live in rural areas and maintain a self-reliant lifestyle.

DeWeese discussed how local governments, under the influence of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), are being pressured to implement policies that align with these global agendas. These policies often include zoning laws that restrict land use or programs that force people off their property under the pretext of environmental protection. "They're trying to control all resources," DeWeese explained, from water to energy to land, all in the name of "sustainability."

Government, Corporations, and the Environment: Who Benefits?

The conversation took a hard turn into corporate greed and political collusion, with both guests arguing that many of the crises we face, from hurricanes to environmental degradation, are manufactured or exaggerated to justify more government control and corporate profits. They cited instances where environmental policies seem to hurt the environment more than they help, such as cutting down trees to make way for solar farms. The guests linked this to larger corporations and figures like Bill Gates, who push green energy while quietly ensuring that their operations—often reliant on traditional energy sources—continue to thrive.

An example provided was Gates' involvement in hurricane manipulation technologies. While presented as a tool for reducing hurricane damage, Howse and his guests speculated that such technology could also be used to "juice up" hurricanes, thus creating larger disasters that justify further governmental or corporate interventions.

Open Borders and Resource Control: The True Aim of Globalism?

One of the more provocative aspects of the discussion was how open borders, promoted by Agenda 2030, are part of a broader plan to control resources globally. Hohmann pointed out that while citizens in the developed world will soon face restrictions on movement, including limits on how often they can travel by air, migrants from poorer nations are being encouraged to move freely across borders. This, he argued, is part of a strategy to shift global demographics and economic power while centralizing control over the world’s resources.

The Path Forward: Non-Compliance and Local Action

Both Hohmann and DeWeese urged listeners to resist compliance with unjust governmental mandates and globalist initiatives. They stressed the importance of local action, arguing that communities can resist these encroachments by organizing and pushing back against harmful policies at the local level. "Non-compliance is the only way to take down this system," Hohmann stated, emphasizing that change starts from the bottom up, with individual and local efforts.

In closing, the discussion underscored the need for awareness and education about these global agendas, which are often disguised as well-meaning environmental or humanitarian efforts. Both guests warned that without vigilance, individual freedoms could be eroded under the pretext of global sustainability and security.

Full Show: https://worldviewtube.com/tv/video/fema-trying-steal-vital-rescue-items…