Chris Pinto, December 17, 2013

THE HIRAM REVIEW Chris discusses a recent review of last week's debate with Dr. James White, in which critical issues were addressed by the reviewer. In this particular case, the reviewer began believing that Dr. White's position was correct, however, by the end of the debate he had changed his mind. His analysis led him to recognize a distinction between historic facts and the speculative arguments of textual critics. Also discussed is the issue of "collation" and whether or not it was a significant issue in the debate.